Round One Wrap Up


“I don’t eat fast food often, but I love tacos. I could write prophetically about how perfect the taco is.”

Ken Baumann

Life, Liberty, and The Love of Tacos

It was another great day of hoops featuring several upsets, a couple of first time winners, and the world’s largest taco…sort of. Read on for this year’s round one wrap up.

  • Things I will not be watching in March, 2019: When we were newly married, my wife, Heather, was looking for college basketball on the TV on a night that, unbeknownst to her, the tournament had not yet begun. This was before all of the play-in silliness started, mind you. Coming across a game in the post-season NIT, she asked, “NIT? What’s the NIT?” After a brief but perfectly timed comedic pause she exclaimed, “Not In the Tournament!” Exactly. Sorry, Indiana fans, but the NIT will not be discussed here. I won’t be watching. Add to that list the latest predictably doomed experiment in forming an professional American football league to compete with the NFL, the Alliance of American Football. Like its predecessors, the USFL and XFL, this ragtag collection of football has-beens, rejects, and wannabes will take its place on the ash heap of sports history with only an ESPN 30 for 30 film to remind us of its existence. Speaking of football…
  • If Liberty University had a football program, #0 Myo Baxter-Bell could play left tackle. (Well, actually at 6′ 5″ and 255 lbs, he’s way too small to play O-Line in the FBS, but Liberty is a small school, after all, so…) He’s a wide body and a key contributor to Liberty’s first-ever NCAA tournament victory, one of three wins by a 12 seed in this year’s bracket. Incidentally, this is the first time three 12’s have advanced in the same tournament in five years. Speaking of firsts…
  • Top seeds get another minor scare. For the first time in tournament history, two 16 seeds led games at the half on the same day. Neither went on to victory like last year’s UMBC. Thus, the web masters for Gardner-Webb and Iona need not fear their servers being crashed this evening by overwhelming traffic from people trying to figure out who they are.
  • The bigger they come, the harder they Fall. Tacko Fall, that is, the 7′ 6″ (you read that right – the man is actually seven-and-a-half feet tall), size 22 shoe wearing, sleeps in two beds pushed together, can’t find clothes big enough to fit him, showers on his knees phenom from the University of Central Florida with the, hands down, best name in basketball. I had this amusing exchange via text with Mrs. Little this evening relating to the big man. Heather: “Ok fav player UCF Tacko Fall”. Jeff: “Yes! He’s awesome.” Heather: “As are all tacos.” Seriously, the man is just enormous. The TV broadcast showed a still image of him standing between the 5′ 2″ Tracy Wolfson, who barely comes to his waist, and the not-small-at-all 6′ 8″ Grant Hill, whom he also dwarfs. Fall is a computer science major, which makes me love him all the more.
  • Ban the free time outs. Is it just me, or are this year’s officials becoming increasingly anal-retentive over how much time ought to be on the game clock, especially after stoppages happening in the final minute? In the games I watched it seemed as though the zebras were constantly going to the monitor to put anywhere from a few seconds to a few tenths of a second back on the clock. Now, I’m all for accuracy in the era of super slow motion instant replay, but the problem with this practice is that it provides what amounts to a free time out to both teams. This can be significant. In at least one game I watched, such a situation arose at a point where neither team had a time out remaining, and yet there they were, at their respective benches going over strategy with their coaches. If the NCAA is really committed to the officials going through this Doctor Strange time adjustment routine several times a game, the players on the floor should be sent to opposite corners away from their benches where they can talk among themselves but not with their coaching staff. Get with the program, NCAA. No more freebies!
  • Do you know the way to San Jose? This particular site provided plenty of drama and bonus points, with the first three games all being won by double-digit seeds.
  • The B1G (pronounced “Big Ten” for reasons known only to folks like Prince who adopt weird symbols in place of actual names and expect us to know what we are supposed to call them) is now 7-1 thanks to Ohio State’s semi-surprising victory over Iowa State. Big Ten apologists will use this as evidence to support their assertion that the B1G (there’s that weird symbol again) is the strongest conference in the country. Indiana fans will use it to justify their offense at the Hoosiers omission from the tournament field.
  • 18 inches of nope: I have always loved those clever Allstate commercials with the actor who plays the incarnation of Mayhem. This year’s newest installment has Mayhem taking on the form of a basketball goal in which he describes himself as “18 inches of nope”. Nowhere was this better demonstrated than in the UCFVCU game where the score was 5-2 nearly seven minutes in. I wonder if Mayhem watches March Madness with his incarnate pals Death, Famine, and War. I heard Thanos was there, too, but Death sent him out for chips and dip.

Round One Awards

I know I implied that the best alias awards would be given tonight, but seeing that it is 2:21 AM EDT, and sensing the fog of exhaustion settling over my heavy eyelids, those will have to wait until I have both the time and energy to judge the creative wit of hundreds of minions. Until then, have a banana and enjoy these round one awards.

  • The I Hate This Stupid Scoring System award, self-awarded via his alias, goes to Gavin Hand, who incredibly picked 31 out of 32 round one games correctly! That’s right – he missed just a single game. The problem for Gavin is that the game he missed, UC Irvine’s victory over Kansas State, was worth 10 points total thanks to the upset bonus. This puts him in eighth place, not first.
  • The Dirty Dozen award, given in honor of the three 12 seeds that won in the first round, goes to the contestants who picked all 12 (yes, that’s ironic) first round upsets correctly: Tim Warren, Billy Brundage, Chad Wright, Dave Barndt, Adams Drew (did you reverse your first and last names in the entry form?), Don Townsend, John Hart, Paul Smith, Kip Layman, and Matthew Hickey.
  • Kip Layman also gets the Career Counselor award for advising me to quit my day job and become a sports writer. As much as I appreciate the sentiment, I think I will stick with what I know and keep this as a hobby.
  • The Hope Springs Eternal award goes to Sydney “I lost last year hopefully not this year” McDaniel, who is, indeed, not in last place…barely.
  • The You Know That Strategy Never Works award goes to Matthew Hickey, who, true to his annual tradition, picked the upset for all 32 games. This puts him in a tie for 49th, but there’s nowhere to go but down from there.
  • The I Might Beat You, But I Will Never Cheat You award goes to yours truly thanks to my current position of third place. First, I am way too invested in the integrity of this contest to rig it in my favor, so put those thoughts out of your head. Second, I have never won my own contest in 23 tries so far, so give me the benefit of the doubt.
  • The First Runner Up award goes to second place contestant Giuseppe DiIulio. If Steve Harvey were running this contest, you would be in first.
  • The You Ignored The Rules But I Will Let It Slide Since You Are Doing So Well award goes to Lizzy Randomly Picking who failed to enter her actual last name in the entry form. Tisk tisk, Lizzy, but if you really did pick randomly, your 15th place ranking says something about how much of this contest is luck versus strategy.
  • The Look On The Bright Side, Your Final Four Are All Still Alive award goes to last place contestant Stevie Cooper. Hang in there, Stevie. You likely will not remain in last for long.
  • And finally, the Leader In The Clubhouse award goes to first place contestant Billy Brundage, who not only has a terrifically performing bracket, but also a name that is totally fun to say!

That’s it for now, minions. Time for a little battery recharge before today’s games give us the first half of the Sweet Sixteen and our next edition of the commentary. Until then, I bid you good night.

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Home Page

Day Two Midday Madness

” Porridge. Who does she think I am, Goldilocks? Anteaters only eat ants. And that’s an ant.” – The Aardvark from The Ant and the Aardvark

Fear The Anteaters!

Greetings, fair minions! I am happy to report that I am home, unpacked, and back in the saddle for a full weekend of March Madness. The nice thing about coming back from a golf vacation is still being on vacation and, thus, having time to watch basketball all day. In case you missed it due to mundane responsibilities like work, here are a few highlights from today’s afternoon session.

  • What’s a guy gotta do to get an ant? Anyone remember the cartoon from the early 70’s called The Ant and the Aardvark? It aired as part of The Pink Panther, which was my favorite Saturday morning cartoon when I was a young wizard. Remember when you used to get up at the crack of dawn on Saturdays just to watch cartoons? Sweet memories. Now I get up before sunrise on Saturdays to spend 24 straight hours at a show choir competition, but I digress. Anyway, the big story of the day so far is UC Irvine’s first ever tournament victory, a 13-over-4 upset of Kansas State. The Anteaters have a winning streak dating back to January, and one would think that a Sweet Sixteen appearance would be a real boon to the contestants who picked them. Weirdly, however, another win by UC Irvine would be worth only a single upset bonus point thanks to today’s other big upset…
  • The Big 10 finally loses a game. After going 6-0 in early tournament action, the Big 10 suffered its first loss when the Wisconsin Badgers lost in the quintessential 12-5 trap game to trendy tournament Cinderella Oregon. Personally, I detest watching Wisky games. Their style of play sets basketball back 50 years. The Ducks will now face the aforementioned anteaters, guaranteeing a double-digit seed makes the Sweet Sixteen this year.
  • Cincinnati’s woes continue. I forget the exact stat, but I heard it mentioned in the live game call. The Cincinnati Bearcats have failed to make the Sweet Sixteen for several years in a row now, and this year will not break the trend. In another upset, the Iowa Hawkeyes provided three more upset bonus points to the sharp minions who picked them.
  • Virginia says “never again”. In the worst possible case of deja vu, the Virginia Cavaliers were down six at the half to 16-seed Gardner-Webb. You may recall that the Cavaliers have the dubious honor of becoming the only 1-seed ever to lose to a 16 last year. Fortunately, they woke up in the second half and beat the pants off of the school that sounds more like a personal injury lawyer. Seriously, the poor fellows walked off the court sans pants. Very embarrassing.
  • First four no more. Since its inception in 2011, the First Four has provided four “play-in” games where eight teams compete for four spots in the field of 64 – two 16 seeds and two 11 seeds. Every single year for eight years, one of the 11 seeds has won at least one game in the actual tournament. That streak comes to an end this year with both Belmont and Arizona State failing to advance past the first round.
  • Double duty. If you watched any of the games on CBS, you may have heard from NCAA rules analyst Gene Steratore. NFL fans may be surprised or confused, because Steratore was a well-known NFL referee for many years. Indeed, Steratore worked as both an NFL referee and an NCAA basketball official.
  • It’s good to be king. So far teams seeded 1-3 are undefeated. That isn’t all that unusual. Only once has a 16 seed won a game. 15 seeds have only 8 wins in tournament history, and 14 seeds have just 21 wins. Perhaps Georgia State can get the job done against Houston this evening.

Quick Awards

This being the midday update, I only have time for a few awards. Look for more this evening in the round one wrap up.

  • The Don’t Blink, You’ll Miss It award goes to Adam Detamore and Vanessa Sopke for the fleeting moments they spent in first place in the contest. It was fun while it lasted.
  • The You’ve Got Mail award goes to perennial contestant Bill Spyksma, aka Wazzu Spike, who has been emailing me all day, mostly in reference to the fact that he now sits atop the standings. He fears it may be short-lived. It usually is.
  • Not to be outdone, the Helping Hand award, sponsored by Hamburger Helper, goes to Jonathan Hand, who also sits atop the standings at the moment in a tie with Bill.
  • The Blame Game award goes to Tony Isch for his amusing tweets blaming ESPN’s Jay Bilas for his lousy bracket performance. That’s what you get for trusting the experts, Tony.
  • The Flattery Will Get You Nowhere, But It Will Get You A Shout Out award goes to Dave Barndt, who messaged me on Facebook to express his feeling of honor and privilege to be tied with The Wizard of Whiteland in the standings. Here’s hoping it doesn’t stay that way, Dave.

Time to turn our attention back to the evening session. There is plenty more to come late tonight in the final round one commentary. Until then…

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Home Page

Day One Debrief


If you watch a game, it’s fun. If you play it, it’s recreation. If you work at it, it’s golf.

Bob hope

Golf And March Madness Make Strange Bedfellows

I spent the afternoon attempting to do simultaneously two activities that require singular focus: golf and updating the Jeff’s March Madness Contest results. The results were mixed, although I am not certain that I can blame the deficiencies in my golf game on the distraction of day one hoops. My biggest problem on the golf course was hitting 24-foot putts 12 feet and 12-foot putts 24 feet. For the uninitiated, that is not the object of the game. Nevertheless, a good time was had by all, I managed to update all of the game winners within a reasonable time frame (except for the Murray State game, which I updated late in the evening thanks to a tweet from alert minion Jordan Lane), and no golf clubs were harmed in the process. That’s a good day.

Another Record Setting Year

I was pleasantly surprised when I saw that we have a record number of entries this year at 869. The popularity of this little contest never ceases to amaze and humble me. Thanks to all of you, faithful minions, this is the biggest (and hopefully the best) contest in its storied 24-year history. Please forgive me if this first edition of the commentary isn’t quite up to the usual standards. It is rather incredible what a day in the Florida sun will do both for and to the mind and body. Therefore, please enjoy this brief but hopefully entertaining rundown of the day’s action.

The Best Things I Saw On My Phone This Week

Unedited for your reading pleasure…

  • “i poked fun at claire for picking murray st over marquette and now i look stupid” – Amber Little, daughter of The Wizard and Rose-Hulman Freshman
  • “Would northeastern going to the sweet sixteen qualify for a scategories bonus? (thinking emoji” – Elliott Murray
  • “Did I make it in? Lol” – Angie Davis, text sent at exactly 12:00 PM EDT (She was thinking the deadline was noon instead of 12:15 PM
  • “3 Big Ten Teams in the same 1/2 of a region? MSU possibly playing Minnesota and Maryland to get to Duke??? NCAA is officially insane. MSU already played the Big Ten Tournament.” – Fess Bryson, who remembers the very earliest days of the contest.

Basketball Games Were Also Played Today

You might be surprised at how much basketball I actually got to watch today, 18 holes of self-abuse not withstanding. Items of note include…

  • Thousands of Michigan State fans nearly went into cardiac arrest when 15-seed Bradley took a two point lead to the halftime locker room. Nightmarish visions of Sparty’s defeat at the hands of 15-seed Middle Tennessee State in 2016 must have been dancing in their heads. Fortunately, the Spartans took care of business in the second half and saved about 800 entries in our contest.
  • Methinks the 1 seeds will be on a mission to obliterate their 16-seed opponents after last year’s history-making UMBC over Virginia debacle. Gonzaga got things rolling tonight with a near 40-point drubbing of hapless Farleigh Dickinson, proving once again that if your school name sounds like the main character in a Emily Bronte novel, you probably do not belong in the tournament field.
  • The 12 seeds always prove problematic for their 5 seed opponents, and today was not exception. Auburn has become something of a bandwagon pick this year, and with good reason, but they survived a real scare, beating New Mexico State by only one point. The aforementioned Marquette was not so fortunate, falling to a team we all knew was better anyway, the Murray State Racers. Well, I guess it’s actually that we all knew that Ja Morant, who has already been crowned the next best thing coming to the NBA since LaBron James, was better. The man put up a triple double. Read that again…slowly…a triple double…in a college game.
  • Then there were the upsets that we were all counting on that didn’t happen. Belmont led for most of the game before losing somehow (I didn’t get to watch any of this game) to Maryland, who as far as I am concerned is still an ACC team. (You’re welcome, Fess Bryson.) Saint Mary’s led defending champs Villanova for a time before finally succumbing 61-57.
  • The school you’ve never heard of, the Wofford Terriers, who will never win the most menacing mascot award, whooped Seton Hall in convincing fashion. The real headline from this game, though, was Wofford’s Fletcher Magee setting the NCAA record for career three point shots made. If you are a college recruiter looking for a three-point sharp shooter, look for the guy with two last names.
  • Nevada was a disappointment. Minnesota was a surprise. There is still plenty of time for Kansas to choke.

Day One Awards

Without much time for review or analysis of the 869 entries, I am not well positioned to hand out many awards tonight. However, since I know this is the best and most coveted part of the contest, I offer a few to whet your appetite.

  • The Never Get Advice From The Competition award goes to Claire Perkins, who is the “Claire” mentioned above who was mocked for her Murray State pick. The rest of that story is that she was dissuaded from her choice and changed her pick. Bad move.
  • The Top Seller award goes to the private group with the most members, Cru Digital Strategies. The fine folks at Cru contributed a whopping (not to be confused with the aforementioned whooping, which is something different altogether) 63 entries to the contest. Many thanks to the Cru crew.
  • The Peter Piper Picked A Peck Of Perfect Picks award goes to six brilliant minions who picked all 16 day-one games correctly: Eleanor Klein, Charles Harper, Gerardo Macias, Rita Dieringer, Gavin Hand, and Ken Dunbar. Way to go!

That’s all I have for today, minions. I will back tomorrow with more in depth analysis, groan-inducing witticisms, and the much anticipated “best alias” awards. Until then, good night.

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Home Page

2018 Opening Commentary

“A bee is never as busy as it seems; it’s just that it can’t buzz any slower.” – Kin Hubbard

Ready, Fire, Aim!

Hello Minions, and welcome back to our annual Spring rite of passage.  We did not have quite as many entries this year as we have had recently, but we still have a very strong field of 766 entries.  I do not know why we “lost” about 75 entries from last year.  Perhaps my commentary is running out of steam after so many years, and the same tired, old jokes and puns aren’t as funny as they used to be.  Perhaps interest in the tournament is waning a bit.  Perhaps folks are worried that any association with NCAA basketball whatsoever will expose them to an FBI investigation.  Or, maybe folks are just too busy for this foolishness.  Seriously, I do not know what your week has been like, but I can tell you with certainty that for me it is best summed up by a wise and ancient proverb:

“They don’t call it March Madness for nothing.”

OK, maybe that proverb is neither wise nor ancient.  In fact, I just made it up a few seconds ago.  To tell the truth, just about everything I am doing this week feels like an exercise in ready, fire, aim!  Not only are we on the cusp of the best 48 hours in all of sports, but I have multiple work-related tasks I am trying to wrap up so that I can head to Florida on Saturday for my OTHER annual Spring rite of passage, GOLF!  So, if my early editions of the commentary this year do not seem up to par (pun absolutely intended), please forgive me.  Work is distracting me from March Madness.

Enough complaining.  Now that I have overslept, done three conference calls, signed some documents for the impending sale of my rental property (the signing agent locked his keys in his car in my driveway and had to call his wife to bring a spare set, poor guy), downed the first cup of coffee, and inhaled a bowl of marshmallow Fruit Loops, I am ready to down the NEXT cup of coffee, write some really clever stuff to make the minions smile, and hopefully actually watch some basketball in between the software installations I am grinding through today.  I guess I was not done complaining after all.

Dilly Dilly!

One of the side effects of running this contest and watching so much basketball on TV is being subjected to hundreds of iterations of the same collection of commercials.  Without a doubt, my favorites – and my most hated – will make their way into my tomes from time to time.  I am truly impressed by the talent and skill of people who work in marketing.  This is a skill I do not possess.  When you create an add campaign that makes its way into the modern vernacular as a catch phrase, you know you have done your job.  Where’s the beef?  Got milk?  Just do it!  Nationwide is on your side.  This year’s example of catch phrases that will live forever has to be Bud Light’s “Dilly Dilly!”  I don’t drink beer, and I have no idea what this little phrase means, but I find myself exclaiming, “Dilly Dilly!” whenever something good happens.  Don’t lie.  You do it, too.

Then there is the latest round of Geico commercials, the “as long as fill-in-the-blank-is-true, you can count on Geico saving folks money” commercials.  If you haven’t seen the one with McGruff the crime-fighting dog, you need to search it on YouTube.  It is hilarious.  Maybe McGruffy-Wuffy can give me a tippy-wippy on my picks next year – after he goes outside for his tinky-poo-poo, that is.

Mascot Madness

Those of you who have done the contest for years know I like to follow the team mascots, especially those that are unique or unusual.  This year I have discovered a few mascots that simply make no sense.  For example, can you guess what the mascot is for the Loyola-Chicago Ramblers?  A wolf.  Oh, absolutely, when I think of a “Rambler” the first thing that comes to mind is a wolf.  Apparently the mascot used to be a hobo, but the era of political correctness deemed having a homeless person as a mascot culturally insensitive.  While I do not necessarily disagree with that assessment, it doesn’t seem like much effort was expended in coming up with a replacement.  I wonder if they play “Rambling Man” by the Allman Brothers before games.

Staying on this theme, the mascot for the Wright State Raiders is…wait for it…a wolf.  Now, I suppose wolves conduct raids of sorts, but come on.  When I think “Raider” I think “pirate” not “wolf”.  Actually, “Raider” makes me think of Al Davis, but I digress.  Then we have the uber-hyphenated Cal-State-Fullerton Titans, whose mascot is obviously some giant monster from Greek mythology, right?  Nope.  It’s an elephant.  I suppose an elephant is a rather large animal, but I am not sure I’d go so far as to call it a titan.

And finally, I think it is obvious that the graduating seniors among us who are considering English as a major (why anyone would consider English as a major is beyond me, but to each his own) should favor Bucknell over Lipscomb.  Both have the Bison as their mascot, but Bucknell uses the proper plural form, going by “The Bucknell Bison”.  Lipscomb, on the other hand, are officially known as “The Lipscomb Bisons”.  I am not kidding.  Look it up.  This may not bother most of you, but I know there are those among us who had Gary Hyslop for English in the 8th grade, and for us, it’s a real problem.

And how about those Bonnies of Saint Bonaventure?  Does their mascot lie over the ocean?  Nope.  It’s a wolf.  I am not making this up.

By The Numbers

This has become something of a ritual, so as not to disappoint, here is this year’s analytics rundown.

  • 766 – The number of entries in this year’s contest.  Not a record by any means, but I still marvel at how many people actually enter this thing every year.
  • 116 – Number of rookies in this year’s contest.  Welcome!  I speak for all of the veterans when I say that I hope you do terrible.
  • 1 – Number of contestants who took the it-never-works-and-never-will approach of picking the upset for all 32 of the first round games.  I’m not mentioning any names, but it was Matthew Hickey.
  • 6 – Number of minions who took the safe route and picked no first round upsets at all.  For the record, that strategy has never been successful, either.
  • 377 – Number of contestants who have made at least one pick that qualifies for the coveted scategories bonus.
  • 13 – Number of games that Texas Southern lost IN A ROW to start the season, and yet they made the field by winning their conference tournament.  They have the honor of getting obliterated by Xavier.
  • 9 – Number of teams the ACC has in the field this year, same as last year, and also the most of any conference again.
  • 0 – Number of times in 22 tries that I have won my own contest.

Early Awards

It is time to close this edition and get back to some real work, but before I go, here are a few awards to whet your appetite for what’s to come.

  • The First In Line award goes to Cheri Howerton-Rayles, the first entry in this year’s contest.
  • The Skin Of Your Teeth award goes to JJ Deaver, our last contestant to make it in this year literally seconds before the deadline.
  • For the second year in a row, the Top Recruiter award goes to the Cru Crew from Cru Digital Strategies, the private group with the largest number of members at 50.
  • The Coach K award, given in honor of the famed Duke coach with name that is hard to say and even harder to spell, goes to the contestant with the most interesting name I have ever seen, I think, in 23 years: Wojtek chodzko-zajko.  Now, maybe the joke’s on me, and that is not said minion’s real name.  However, assuming it is (since the rules say you have to use your real name, remember?), from now on I will just call you CZ.
  • The I Managed To Overcome The Technical Limitations Of This Ancient Website And Enter The Contest Anyway award goes to Jay Moritz the younger, or perhaps more properly Jay Moritz II.  No doubt Jay’s first attempt to enter failed, because his father had already entered as Jay Moritz.  Since my database model requires the first name/last name combination to be unique, Jay smartly entered as Jay2 Mortiz.  Jay2 sounds like a cool hip-hop stage name.  Maybe he should look into that as a career.

Ok, minions.  I have to sign off for now and get back to some real work…and hopefully watch a little basketball in the process.  I will return with the midday update early this evening.

Busily Yours,

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Homepage

The Last Word

“Whoever said, ‘It’s not whether you win or lose that counts,’ probably lost.” – Martina Navratilova

I had a strange experience tonight.  I was watching a free throw shooting contest, and a basketball game nearly broke out.  While I thought the first half of this game was well-played, fairly officiated (for the most part), and exciting to watch, the second half was a teeth-gnashing nightmare.  I have watched some national championship games that were excruciatingly unentertaining (UConn vs Butler, anyone?), but typically it was because of a blowout, poor shooting by one or both teams, or generally poor play by one or both teams.  But what was it that made this game nearly unwatchable after the break?  Oh, let us count the ways…

  • The Body Count Is Rising – There were fouls aplenty in this game, 44 to be exact, 22 whistled on each team.  I guess at least it was even.  The teams collectively shot an unbelievable 52 free throws (weirdly, again even at exactly 26 apiece), even more unbelievably missing 20 of them.  Neither team could take over the game in the second half because these whistle-happy referees decided to take it over instead, to the detriment of both teams, the fans in the building, and the viewers at home.  Even the Nance-Hill-Raftery trio was noticeably exasperated by the utter lack of game flow in the second half.  Both teams were constantly sending guys in and out to play the foul trouble dance, which prevented many of the star players from truly make a difference in the game.  Meeks, Jackson, Karnowski, Collins, Williams, and Hicks were all handcuffed by often ridiculous foul calls.  What the officials did for us tonight is make it impossible to know who the truly better team was.  However, I’m the one who said complaining about the officials is a loser’s excuse, and I’ll own that.  North Carolina won the game, and they are the champions.  It could have been MUCH more entertaining, and a much better contest, had the refs not decided to take center stage and make it about them.  This has to be one of the poorest jobs of officiating I’ve seen in a decade, and I’m not saying it cost Gonzaga the game.  It didn’t.  It cost ALL OF US a game, though, because we didn’t get a game.  We got a parade to the free throw line, stupid reviews, and blatantly missed calls.  More on all of that in a moment.
  • By The Numbers – If you look at the box score, you might truly wonder how in the world UNC won this game.  They were out-rebounded 49-46.  They were staggeringly awful from three point range, shooting 4-27 for just 14.8%.  Compare that to Gonzaga who went 8-19 for a respectable 42.1%.  Gonzaga also made two more free throws (a stat which surprised me, as it felt like all Gonzaga did was MISS free throws all night).  About the only stat where UNC was superior was the one that mattered most, total points on 35.6% shooting compared to Gonzaga’s barely-worse 20-59 for 33.9%.  The Tarheels did take 14 more shots that Gonzaga, and that no doubt was a factor.
  • Karnowski Was A No-Show – Gonzaga’s mountain of a man, Przemek Karnowski had his worst game of the tournament at the worst possible time.  He made only one basket all night and missed seven shots from about 4 feet or less.  Collins typically picks up he slack when the Big Pole is off, but that was impossible tonight with Collins getting whistled for a foul pretty much every time he exhaled.  Before fouling out, Zach Collins was 4-6 from the field, 1-1 from the line, with 7 rebounds, 1 steel, and 3 blocks.  Imagine what a game he might have had had he been allowed to actually play more than two consecutive minutes.
  • Upon Further Review, The Review Process Should Be Terminated – I am flabbergasted to the point of struggling to find words for how stupidly administered the review process has become in college basketball.  In the space of three days I have witnessed two high-profile games in which a foul which was NOT CALLED become a foul after the fact because a review deemed the not-called foul to be flagrant.  I was under the impression that the flagrant foul rules were instituted to cut down on player injuries, ergo, to punish intentionally rough play.  I was also under the impression that called fouls could be upgraded to flagrants upon further review, but apparently that’s only in the NBA.  In college, it seems, you don’t have to have a foul called first in order to upgrade to a flagrant.  You can just go for the flagrant in one swell foop.  No foul required.  In the UConn vs Mississippi State women’s semi final and again in tonight’s men’s final we witnessed completely accidental contact that was not called as a foul in live action being retroactively called not just a foul, but a flagrant foul, which carries free throws and possession of the ball as a penalty.  In the women’s game, this review took place AFTER THE ENSUING POSSESSION BY THE OTHER TEAM!  How does that fit the spirit of reducing intentionally rough play?  What possible benefit do these preposterous deliberations by the striped tribunal bring to the game?  Now, as I’ve already said, Karnowski was not playing well in tonight’s game, but after that flagrant incident, if you were watching, you noticed he just completely quit playing altogether.  He was done.  This hurt the Zags even more after Williams-Goss, the only Gonzaga player who could score down the stretch, suffered a freakish ankle injury with 90 seconds left that basically made it impossible for him to be effective.  Instead of hunkering down and trying to make one play when it counted, Karnowski just stood around and watched.  Don’t get me wrong.  I think PK is a terrific player, but I think his rough start coupled with the way the game was called in the second half just shut him down completely.  Anyway, back to the topic of reviews.  So at ANY POINT in the game, you can stop play, stand at the monitor for five minutes, and assess a foul that was not called in live action because it was “flagrant”.  BUT, you can’t review easily fixable, non-subjective and blatantly wrong calls, such as the not-tipped shot that erroneously went to Gonzaga, because it didn’t happen in the final two minutes of the game.  Stupid.  Unspeakably stupid.  And then, why in the world was the held ball where replay shows Meeks clearly out of bounds while touching the ball NOT reviewed when that took place under the two minute mark?  The whole thing is a circus, capriciously and unevenly applied, unfair to both teams, exerting undo influence on game outcomes for reasons that defy any measure of logic, and barring major reforms, should be done away with entirely.  And speaking of video reviews and changing calls after the fact…
  • How About We Just Let The Fans Tweet The Officials To Prompt Video Reviews? – I mean, it works great in golf, right?  Why not basketball?  Let’s just let the fans in the arena or at home send a tweet or a text or an email to the officials whenever they want to point out an infraction they saw on TV.  Better yet, let’s let ’em do it any time before the game is over, even if the supposed infraction happened in the previous half.  And let’s assess free throws and possession of the ball and such retroactively based on a video review prompted by these concerned citizens.  ICYMI, the golfing world is enduring another rules-violation scandal involving an anonymous spectator emailing tournament officials about a rules violation committed by Lexi Thompson in the LPGA’s first major of the season.  Here’s the kicker.  This virtuous whistleblower waited until the next day to send the email, thereby increasing Lexi’s penalty, because she signed an incorrect scorecard.  Of course, she had no opportunity to sign a correct scorecard, because she wasn’t notified of the infraction until a day later.  Now, we can argue all day about whether or not she broke the rules, if the rule she broke is idiotic or not, and whether the penalty was appropriate or not.  The first question I want to ask is, how in the world do these spectators get their hands on an email address for the rules officials?  I mean, do the PGA and LPGA publish a “report an infraction” link on their websites?  Here’s the point I really want to make.  You don’t let fans have any input, ever, into the rules officiating process in any sport, because fans are not impartial by definition.  I simply cannot fathom why officials in professional golfing events allow this to happen.  There’s no way to know for sure, of course, but what if this particular “armchair weasel” as one frustrated fan Tweeted, noticed the infraction when it happened, but waited purposefully until the next day to report it in order to magnify the severity of the penalty?  Had she been notified prior to the end of that round, she could have taken her two-stroke penalty, signed a correct score card, and avoided the additional two-stroke penalty.  This whole fiasco cost her the championship, folks.  Again, one can argue she broke the rules, and so it’s her own fault.  Granted.  But in a sport so obsessed with the integrity of the game, allowing fans with agendas to participate in the adjudication of rules violations is putting the inmates in charge of the asylum.  Such a policy also unfairly targets popular players and tournament front runners, because they are the ones getting most of the TV time, whereas players further back in the standings or less popular are not being scrutinized nearly as closely.  If you’re leading a golf tournament, every shot you take is on camera.  If you’re in 69th, not so much.  So again, until you can get a camera on every shot by every player all the time, and you can set up an official team to be in charge of reviews, and input from spectators is both forbidden and ignored, no decisions in golf should be made based on video review.  None.  Ok, back to basketball…
  • Championship Surprises – Aside from being horrifically not-fun to watch, regardless of which team you were rooting for, there were a couple of surprises in this game.  UNC’s Joel Berry, whom I expected to be a non-factor due to his injuries, was the hero of the game for the Tarheels, scoring a game high 22 points and generally making the key plays when it counted.  On the other hand, Gonzaga’s Nigel Williams-Goss, whom I expected to not be hampered by injury at all, suffered a freak injury at the worst possible moment in the game.  You have to feel for the Zags, as they faced a perfect storm of circumstances and yet still were within a point with less than 90 seconds to play.  But the Zags didn’t lose this game because of officiating, awful as it was, or because of that injury to Williams-Goss.  Karnowski could not buy a bucket.  Williams-Goss missed half his free throws.  And they had that awful second half drought that I have seen way too many times this year as a Zags fan, and they could not afford that in this game.
  • They Aren’t Underdogs Anymore – It is my hope that the general public now recognizes Gonzaga basketball for the terrific program it is, and grows to love and appreciate it as much as I have over the past 18+ years.  Mark Few and his men had a genuine breakthrough season, and while I wish it had ended with a championship, I am still very proud of this team.  They went further than many thought they ever could.
  • Credit Where It Is Due – In some ways, North Carolina winning another championship is like the New England Patriots winning another Super Bowl.  It lacks a certain novelty that leads to a “ho-hum, so what” response.  That was certainly my response, but they really deserve better.  Coach Roy Williams won his 100th NCAA tournament game, and that’s no small accomplishment.  This is UNC’s sixth national championship, and to be fair, these particular guys were on a mission to avenge their own heartbreaking loss at the hands of Villanova last year.  Mission accomplished.  Congratulations, Tarheels.  You are national champions.

And now without further ado, I present the 22nd Annual Jeff’s March Madness Contest final awards.

Final Awards

  • The Rookie Of The Year award goes to first-time contestant Raleigh “BadgerBuster” Wade who finished 5th overall with 168 points.  Raleigh will receive a commemorative poster of every one-and-done Kentucky player of the Calipari era.
  • The Little Einstein award goes to the winner of the 12-and-under age bracket, Jordyn Glassley, who placed 13th overall.  Based on her alias, it looks like Jordyn will ACTUALLY be receiving her favorite Blizzard from DQ, courtesy of dear old dad.
  • The Teen Wolf award goes to the top finisher in the 13-19 age bracket, William “McPick2” Harper, who finished 9th overall.  William will receive an autographed photo of Michael J. Fox.  Ask your parents who that is.
  • The Magnificent Millennial award goes to the 2nd place finisher in the twenty-something age bracket, Evan “Make March Great Again!” Whiteaker, because the 1st place finisher was our rookie of the year.  Evan finished 19th overall and will receive a commemorative Make March Great Again hat signed by Donald Trump.
  • The Guessing Game award goes to Trevor “No Logic. No Strategy. All coinflips” Norcross, winner of the thirty-something age bracket and 3rd place overall.  Trevor will receive a set of 63 quarters to flip next year, one for each game.
  • The 45 Is The New 44 award goes to forty-something age bracket winner and overall contest runner-up, Chad “My Picks Are Awful” Wright.  Chad finished just six points behind our contest winner.
  • Since our contest champion this year came from the fifty-something age bracket, our March Madness 5-0 award goes to the second place finisher in that age bracket, David “ChumpChange” Boyd, who finished 17th overall.
  • The Geriatric award goes to our top senior prognosticator, Patty Carson, who finished 6th overall.  Patty will receive a lifetime membership to life alert, just in case in all the excitement of the tournament she has fallen and can’t get up.
  • The annual Top Prognosticator award is typically given to the contestant who picks the most games correctly without regard to upset or scategories bonuses.  Ironically, this would also be our contest champion, which I guess demonstrates how little upsets factored in to the ultimate outcome this year.  So, we will give the award instead this year to the second best picker, Ethan Grunden, who went 50-13 and finished in 10th place overall.  (Coincidentally, last year’s top prognosticator also picked 51 games correctly, as did our contest champion this year, but finished in 32nd place.  Upsets, or lack thereof, really make a difference.)
  • The I Hate This Stupid Scoring System award goes to the lowest finishing contestant with a win/loss percentage of at least .700.  This year’s winner is Sven Schoenherr, winner of 45 games but finishing in 414th place.  By way of comparison, our 4th place finisher overall had the same number of wins as Sven.
  • The I Love This Awesome Scoring System award goes to the highest finishing contestant with a win/loss percentage below .500.  This year’s winner is 25th place finisher Paul Smith, whose apparent definition of insanity involves picking only 27 out of 63 games correctly while still finishing in the top 25.
  • The Yellow Lines And Dead Skunks award goes to middle-of-the-road finisher and personal golfing buddy, Ryan Helton, who ended up smack dab in the middle at 421st.  This is an appropriate award for Ryan, since the middle of the road is typically where his golf ball ends up.
  • The Final Four award goes to 4th place finisher Alyssa Regan who climbed from 703rd all the way up to a top 4 finish.
  • The Seventh Heaven award goes to 7th place finisher Jessi “J. Mar” Marshall.  Jessi will receive all ten seasons of Seventh Heaven on Blu Ray.
  • The Oscar Meyer award goes 8th place contestant Tony “Toney Baloney” Isch, who must have spent the majority of his childhood having the other kids sing to him, “My baloney has a first name…”  Tony will receive a year’s supply of Oscar Meyer wieners.
  • The Close Only Counts In Hand Grenades And Horseshoes award goes to 41st place finisher Alicia “Gonzaga sounds close to Godzilla” Davis, who would have won the contest had Gonzaga pulled off the victory.  Since I have neither hand grenades (too dangerous) nor horseshoes (my HOA doesn’t allow farm animals), Alicia will receive a vintage Godzilla costume along with a 1/30th scale model of Tokyo to destroy in her next fit of rage.
  • The I Pretty Much Don’t Care, But I Didn’t Come In Last award goes to the contestant who picked the fewest number of games correctly (20), Makenna “Makuna Manada” Moen.  Makenna made no re-picks whatsoever, won only 20 games, but still finished in 769th, which is not last.
  • The Blame Shifting award goes to last place finisher Chares “Shut Up Kara It Wasn’t My Fault” Marr.
  • The Family Feud award goes to the Brantner clan who finished at the top of the surname standings with an average score of 143.50.  It’s weird because Family Feud host, Steve Harvey, had originally told me that my family, the Littles had won, but apparently there was some sort of mix up.
  • This award actually comes from alert minion Chris Deaver.  The 800 Club Award For Contest Futility goes to three contestants who never made it out of the 800s in the standings: Andrew McGuire, Javen Wynn, and Wesley Brauen.  These three will receive a prayer card signed by Pat Robertson, which may help them perform better in the contest next year.
  • Another good friend and alert minion, Dave Barndt, pointed out that two of his sons sandwiched The Wizard in the standings.  We all three scored 119 points, but due to tie breakers, Matthew Barndt finished 140th, The Wizard Of Whiteland finished 141st, and Jonathon Barndt finished 142nd.  I guess I’ll give them the BB&J Sandwich award, which at this time of night sounds delicious.  I haven’t eaten anything in several hours.
  • The I Don’t Need No Stinking Re-picks award goes to my lovely wife, Heather Little, who despite not getting her re-picks submitted for reasons unknown (she claims programmer error, I claim operator error), finished first amongst the Little tribe and 21st overall.
  • The Zach Attack award goes to Zach McConnell and Zach Booher who, ironically, finished with the same point total (152) and right next to each other in the standings at 22nd and 23rd, respectively.
  • The Top Nerd award goes to 14th place finisher Jared “No Place Like 127.0.0.1” Adams.  Jared will receive an autographed picture of Sheldon from Big Bang Theory.
  • And finally, the Ageless Wonder, the Big Kahuna, the Sharpest Shooter, Pun Absolutely Intended, Winner Winner Chicken Dinner, Grand Poobah of Prognostication award goes to this year’s contest champion, Shawna the Sharpeshooter Sharpe.  Shawna correctly picked 51 games, more than any other contestant, but more importantly, she had both Gonzaga and UNC with original picks, and the national champion, UNC, with an original pick.  Weirdly, the only games Shawna got wrong after the re-pick round were three games she re-picked.  (She had Baylor going to the Final Four, which accounted for two losses, and then Kansas in the Final Four, which was the third loss.)  Well done, Shawna.  Listen closely and you will hear the minions singing, “We Are The Champions” in your honor.

With that, I am utterly exhausted and dreading four hours of meetings I have at work starting less than six hours from now.

Final Thoughts

And so we close the books on another year of Jeff’s March Madness Contest.  Thanks to all of you for entering, for inviting others to join, for coming up with those clever aliases that make me laugh, for engaging me on Twitter, Facebook, and via email, and for generally making March my favorite time of the year.  Thanks to my daughter, Amber Little, whose room is above my office, for putting up with late nights of Dad screaming at the television.  There was a lot more of that this year with Gonzaga advancing as far as they did.

Thanks to everyone who responded to the survey regarding updating the contest website.  I’m still pondering whether to move forward with that effort or not.  If I do, I will send out a notification to this list later in the year for those who would like to contribute.

And now the time has come for the Wizard to step back behind the curtain.  May the Lord bless you and keep you, and all those that you hold dear, and may the madness of March be more kind to your bracket next year.

Warmly,

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Homepage

An Unsolicited Rant

“The reason sport is attractive to many of the general public is that it’s filled with reversals.  What you think may happen doesn’t happen.  A champion is beaten, an unknown becomes a champion.” – Roger Bannister

This One Is Free

It has become something of a tradition for me to write one installment of the commentary on one non-game-day during the tournament.  Typically, it’s precipitated by some topic or trend or happenstance about which I simply cannot resist launching into a self-indulgent rant.

So, I am sitting here on the off night between the men’s national semifinals and the championship game.  The women’s championship game is on my TV.  My wonderful wife is cooking supper, and I’m cruising Twitter, reading the buzz about this year’s tournament. A recurring theme I’m seeing in the Twitter-verse is the downplaying or de-legitimizing of Gonzaga’s tournament success, and of course, being the Zags fan that I am, this is all the incentive that I needed.

While I realize the people I am talking to in the diatribe that follows will likely never read it, I still find some measure of catharsis in writing it.  And since you are my captive audience, fair minions, you are the lucky winners of the Jeff Little’s Lecture Lottery.  Here is your freebie for this year.  You’re welcome.

Excuses, Excuses

As is always the case in the realm of sports fandom, the winners do the winning, and the losers do the whining.  Here is a sampling of the gems I saw floating around on Twitter, the reasons why Gonzaga shouldn’t really be taken seriously, even though they will play for the national championship tomorrow night.  (Editor’s Note: Even though I’m surrounding each of these in quotation marks, they are not always direct quotes.  I will paraphrase in many cases, mainly because I am too lazy to go back to Twitter and look everything up.)

  • “Gonzaga had the easiest road to the championship game.  They never had to play a seed higher than 4.”  (16, 8, 4, 11, 7)
  • “Gonzaga hasn’t beaten a single team ranked in the Top 10 the entire season.”
  • “Gonzaga plays in a weak conference and they were rewarded with the #1 seed in the weakest region.  They haven’t played anyone all year.”
  • “Gonzaga only beat West Virginia because of the refs gave them the game.”
  • “Even if Gonzaga beats North Carolina, it means nothing, because UNC’s star point guard is playing on two bad ankles.”
  • And my absolute personal favorite, “Gonzaga [is a bad team] because they lost to BYU.”

OK, boys and girls, it is high time for a not-so-quick lesson in the nature of sports.  Over the course of this discussion, I shall attempt to either directly or indirectly address each of the criticisms above, and perhaps a few others not expressed but implied.

  • It’s Not A Beauty Contest – Polls are just that – polls.  They are based on opinions, not objective outcomes such as wins, losses, and other hard statistics.  I realize that there exist in our world certain activities that are referred to as “sports” but are more like beauty contests where the winners are determined by judges who vote – diving, gymnastics, figure skating, and the like.  I do not wish to disparage any of those activities – they require incredible skills that I do not possess, but to me, they are in a different category from what I will call the “hard sports”.  By hard I don’t mean in terms of difficulty or skill required to be successful, but rather in terms of soft versus hard in the way winners are determined.  In soft sports, winners are determined by votes, and thus the outcome is highly subjective.  In hard sports, winners are determined according to points scored in a well-defined framework of predetermined rules.  While people from the amateur to the expert can and will argue ad infinitum about and vote upon who the best teams are in hard sports, the winners and ultimate champions (with the possible exception of College Football, a topic about which you don’t want to get me started) are not determined by these votes, but rather by results on the field of play.  There a million ways to rank teams in any hard sport, from the highly subjective such as opinion polling of coaches and sports writers, to the more objective such as computerized advanced metrics, but ultimately, in hard sports, Bill “The Tuna” Parcells’ mantra rings true: “You are who your record says you are.”  In any sport that features an end-of-season tournament of any form, whether it’s a single elimination tournament such as March Madness or the NFL playoffs, or a series-based, multiple-loss format such Major League Baseball or the NBA, it doesn’t matter WHOM you play.  It only matters that you WIN.  Winning provides all the legitimacy that is required of a champion.
  • You Don’t Have To Beat Everyone – The most hysterical of the aforementioned criticisms are the ones that attempt to either disparage Gonzaga’s 37 wins (the most of any team in the country, by the way) as unimpressive, or inflate their one loss as the nuclear bomb that destroys the value of all 37 of those wins.  Now, had that one loss come in the post-season tournament, then it certainly would end the season and, in that way, be a bigger loss than any that may have occurred in the regular season.  But this is sports 101, folks.  The regular season serves as a qualifier for the post-season tournament.  This is the way of all hard sports, granted that there are variations in how the qualifying works.  At the professional level, qualification for post-season play tends to depend on wins and losses only, and that is the method I personally prefer.  At the college level, qualification for post-season play is a mixture between actual performance as measured by wins and losses and the beauty contest which is the process by which invitations are extended to participating teams.  I would love for the beauty contest element to be removed from the equation in college sports, but I don’t see that happening any time soon.  Nevertheless, again with the exception of College Football, which I sort of toss out as the black sheep of the sports family because of the utterly nonsensical way the champion is determined, in all hard sports at any level, it is not necessary to go undefeated to ultimately win the championship.  But, let’s take this a step further.  It is also not required that you beat every other team in existence to prove the legitimacy of your championship.  It is not even required that you beat every other team who qualifies for post-season play.  It is not a round-robin system.  You don’t even have to beat the “best” team.  You just have to beat the teams you are required to play.  The argument that goes, “Well, they didn’t even have to play team X, and if they had, they would not even be playing in the championship game,” is utter nonsense and completely irrelevant.  It is not demanded of ANY TEAM, EVER that they beat the one team YOU think they can’t overcome.  The tournament framework is set up according to whatever the system is, and then each team’s task is simply to win the games presented to them.  Teams have zero control over whom they play. All they can do is win and advance.  That being said…
  • It IS About Match Ups – Of course it is true that if the tournament bracket or framework is oriented differently, it will lead to a different outcome.  That’s a given, and it is true at any level of sport, professional or amateur.  It is a big reason why professional teams jockey for playoff positioning at the end of their regular seasons, because who you face in the playoffs matters, of course.  As fans, we love to play the what-if game, but the what-if game is not what determines the eventual champion.  Certain teams create match up problems for certain other teams, and whether a team faces its nemesis in match up terms is, without doubt, a critical factor in how far it is able to advance.  No workable system could be conceived in which a team would have to prove itself against every possible opponent in order to emerge as champion.  In March Madness, the champion is the team that can win six consecutive games against the opponents with which it is presented. This is true of all 64 teams entering the competition.  You can argue all you want about the ease or the difficulty of the match ups (and honestly, that’s part of the fun of it as a fan), and indeed I have my own issues with the committee’s selection process.  I do think it is flawed in many ways.  BUT, that in no way can be used as an argument to somehow de-legitimize a team’s championship.  If you win the tournament, you are the legitimate champion.  That’s what winning the tournament means.  It means you are champion.
  • The Best Team Does Not Always Win – Winning the tournament does not necessarily mean you are the “best” team in the sport by every possible measure. Again, there are many ways to rank teams, and the ranking process is most often a mixture of the subjective and the objective.  But come on, folks, let’s wake up and smell the proverbial coffee.  One of the reasons, if not THE reason, why we find sports so compelling is that the best team does NOT always win.  I hate sports cliches, but I’m going to break one out, because it is appropriate in this context. That’s why they play the game.  You may be the better team by every possible metric, but you still have to take the floor or the field and win.  Winning is the ultimate answer to, “If you’re the best, prove it.”  Just ask Geno Auriemma and the Connecticut Huskies women’s basketball team, without question the best and most dominant basketball program over the last decade, either men’s or women’s, and in the conversation for perhaps the best dynasty of all time, right up there with John Wooden’s UCLA teams.  And yet they are NOT the champion this year, even though one could easily argue they are still the best team in the country.  They are not the champion because they lost in the tournament, and that’s the nature of tournaments.  That’s what makes them so compelling, so exciting, and so much fun to watch.  Coach Auriemma gets this better than anyone, as evidenced by his broad grin after his team LOST the game.  Why was he grinning?  Because he knew that what just happened is what makes his passion so sublime.  If all we had to do is compare pedigrees, ring the gong, and hand out the trophy without playing the game, no one would watch.  No one would care.  Incidentally, the team that beat them, Mississippi State, subsequently lost in the championship game to SEC rival South Carolina just a few hours ago.  Why?  Primarily because they don’t match up well with South Carolina, and South Carolina, being an in-conference rival, is a team familiar with their tactics.  So, does this mean UConn was somehow cheated?  Does it mean South Carolina’s championship is not legitimate because they didn’t even have to play the best team, Connecticut?  No, OF COURSE NOT. So let’s shut up with all of the Gonzaga didn’t have to play Kentucky or Duke or Arizona or Villanova or Kansas or UCLA garbage, OK?  It means nothing at all.
  • Good Wins And Bad Losses – And if you really want to play the whole Truck Stop League versus Conference Of Champions game, Bill Walton, let’s take a look at good wins and bad losses for some of the other teams I see being tossed around Twitter as more “worthy” than Gonzaga.  On the season, the Zags have a single loss, to BYU in the final game of the regular season.  Of course that is a game that they should not have lost, but it is their only blemish on the season.  In the good wins column; they beat Florida when they were unranked, but they finished the season ranked 20th; Arizona when they were ranked 16th, final rank 4th; Iowa State when they were ranked 21st, final rank 17th; and St. Mary’s three times, all of which they were ranked in the top 25.  How about Gonzaga’s foe, UNC?  They had 7 losses on the season, which I believe is close to the most ever for a team receiving a #1 seed in the tournament.  Bad losses?  How about Indiana??!!! Anyone want to argue that Indiana is better than BYU?  Didn’t think so.  (Yes, Indiana was still ranked at that point in the season – 13th.)  They also lost to unranked Miami and unranked Georgia Tech (GT did advance to the NIT championship, losing to TCU), Virginia when they were ranked 23rd, Kentucky, and Duke TWICE, and yet the committee still gave UNC a #1 and Duke a #2.  Let’s take a team that Gonzaga didn’t have to play, say, Kentucky.  Kentucky had a great season with only 5 losses prior to losing to UNC in the tournament.  But one of Kentucky’s losses was to lowly Tennessee.  How about UCLA?  The Bruins had a great win over Kentucky when they were ranked #1, but lost to lowly USC and to Arizona twice.  I could go on and on examining any team you care to bring up and pointing out a great win and a bad loss.  So what is my point?  You cannot take a single “bad loss” and hang it on a team like an albatross and say it makes them undeserving overall. Neither can you demand that a team run the gauntlet and beat every major contender in existence to prove its worth.  Sometimes teams are required to win multiple games against stiff competition to win a championship, and teams that have done just that become the stuff of legend (the 1997 Arizona Wildcats immediately come to mind, and perhaps Danny Manning and the Miracles).  But at other times, champions are not required to beat a parade of heavyweights.  Neither situation makes a team more or less of a legitimate champion.  It just makes for interesting conversation Tuesday morning at work.
  • “Complaining About The Officials Is A Loser’s Excuse” – This is a direct quote from one of my favorite radio play-by-play men, the Pacer’s Mark Boyle.  Every fan complains about the officiating.  I do my share of criticizing officials in this blog.  It’s part of the sports experience.  It’s no mystery at all that officiating can certainly influence the outcome of a game, but officiating is part of the game, and is one of many factors that influence the eventual outcome.  A game’s outcome is dependent upon a myriad of factors, officiating being only one.  It is rare that officiating alone can be blamed for either a victory or a loss.  Is it a significant factor?  Sure.  Is it the factor that trumps all others?  No.  Yes, Gonzaga got the benefit of the missed goal tending call in the game versus Northwestern, but it is impossible to determine what would have happened had the call been made.  At the same time, Gonzaga has no doubt been on the receiving end of missed or questionable calls as well. Every team in the tournament could be said to have both benefited and been hurt by some piece of officiating somewhere along the way. When a call happens at a particularly critical point of the contest, it certainly feels like a determining factor in the final outcome.  But this is not the 1972 Olympics where the charges of conspiracy by the officials were more than a theory, but rather patently obvious to any observer.  Officials are human and make mistakes just like the players.  Overall, though, it’s a wash, and trying to use “the refs won the game for them” or “the refs lost the game for them” as a means to detract from a team’s success smacks of sour grapes.
  • Injuries Are Part Of The Game – Not only is officiating part of the game, but so are injuries.  Injuries are endemic to any sport.  The argument that a team like Gonzaga has or will benefit from an opponent lacking a key player due to injury, thereby implying that its success should be marked with some sort of asterisk, is asinine. Did anyone hear Roy Williams apologizing because UNC beat Oregon without Chris Boucher?  Of course you would prefer to beat a team at full strength, but as a team in competition, you have no control whatsoever over the players your opponent is or isn’t able to field.  People who already are dismissing Gonzaga’s championship, should they win it, as hollow because Joel Berry is hurt are completely clueless about the basic nature of sports. Staying healthy is definitely a key to success, but no victor ever surrendered the trophy because its opponent lost a player to injury.  Unless you can prove the Gonzaga ball boy knee-capped the dude in a dark alley, the argument has no relevance at all.

And thus I conclude my Gonzaga apologetic.  As much as it may sound like the ravings of an unabashed homer, and no doubt to some extent it is just that, I do believe that the principles I’ve presented apply equally to any team and could just as easily be used in defense of the squad of your choice.  We love sports because, again to use a hated cliche, on any given night, anyone can win.  People can and always will try to bring down the winner; it’s human nature to do so, I think.  But the truth is that once they hand you that trophy, you are a champion, and no amount of Tweeting, talking, criticizing or complaining can take that away from you.  Such will be the case for whoever wins tomorrow night, and for my part, I’m rooting for Gonzaga.  All they have to do to be champions is win one more game. They do not have to silence or answer all of their critics.  They do not have to defeat some other opponent who lost too soon for whatever reason its fans care to put forth.  All they have to do is win one more game.  Just one more.  Go Zags!

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Homepage

National Semifinals Wrap Up

“When I was a kid I got no respect. The time I was kidnapped, and the kidnappers sent my parents a note they said, ‘We want five thousand dollars or you’ll see your kid again.'” – Rodney Dangerfield

A Night Of Great Games

Tonight we were treated to two truly exciting games, which is always preferred to Final Four flops.  I find it oddly coincidental that both games were decided by crucial rebounds in the closing seconds, and both games were won by the #1 seed.  After all of the drama and Cinderella stories this year’s tournament provided with the likes of Xavier, Michigan, and South Carolina, the Championship match up followed the path of the chalk, pitting two top seeds against one another in what should be a truly titanic struggle.

  • I Tell Ya, I Get No Respect – While the numbers say the national final is #1 vs #1, it still has the feel of David vs Goliath, heavy favorite vs underdog, storied program vs mid-major.  On the one hand, we have North Carolina vying for its 6th national championship, and on the other, we have Gonzaga who before this year had never made a Final Four much less a championship game.  Gonzaga, whom Bill Walton said didn’t even deserve the #1 seed in the West in his now infamous “Truck Stop League” comment.  Gonzaga, who lost one game and dropped three spots in the national polls behind teams that are long gone from the tournament.  Gonzaga, who were constantly questioned about everything from being able to win a close game (they have now won two against two of the best defenses in the nation…except for THEIR defense, of course, which is, by the way, the top ranked defense according to KenPom.com) to getting monkeys and other jungle creatures off of Coach Mark Few’s back.  While I do certainly recognize the special nature of South Carolina’s story and their accomplishments, it seemed to me that CBS made THAT the story, and Gonzaga’s victory was almost an afterthought.  There’s only one way this Gonzaga squad will earn the respect it deserves, and that is to win on Monday night.  To be sure, it will be no small task, but Gonzaga has proven that they are balanced, steady, poised, resilient, deep, and resolute.  If anyone can slay the mighty Tarheel giant, it is these Zags.
  • The Steve Harvey Award For Bumbling Winner Announcements goes to CBS announcer Greg Gumbel who mistakenly referred to the winner of the first game as either South Carolina or The Gamecocks not once, but twice in the post game show.  The media seemed so captivated by South Carolina’s story that they just couldn’t get away from it.
  • Live By The 3, Die By The 3 – Much will be made about Oregon’s inability to get a defensive rebound not once, but twice at the end of the game on North Carolina’s missed free throws.  Down a single point and smartly fouling Kennedy Meeks, one of the worst free throw shooters on the team, Oregon’s Jordan Bell made no attempt at all to box out North Carolina’s Theo Pinson, who back tapped the ball to a waiting Joel Berry, whom they then had to foul AGAIN.  Berry, who is an 80% foul shooter, unbelievably missed both free throws himself, but once again, Bell could not get the rebound, this time being essentially run over by Meeks.  While one could argue that Meeks deserved a foul on that final rebound, that one play, or even the one before it, are not really why Oregon lost this game.  Instead, Oregon inexplicably shot itself out of the game in the second half, repeatedly jacking up three point shots – sometimes very deep, longer-than-NBA-range three point shots – at a time when they had the game close and needed only to score.  One has to wonder if the absence of Chris Boucher finally caught up with the Ducks.  They seemed to lack any confidence in their inside game, or their ability to drive to the basket, instead settling for those jumpers that they continued to miss.  As a team, they were 7-26 from three point range.
  • Making Sure The Coast Is Clear – Tonight my wife, Heather Little and our son, Graham, attended a birthday party for one of his friends at the local Pizza King. This was during the Gonzaga-South Carolina game, which I was watching here in the command center, and they were watching at the pizza joint.  Heather would later tell me after they came home that she refused to live Pizza King until the game was over, explaining to the other parents, “I need to know what kind of environment I’m going to be coming home to.”  That’s wisdom only 24 years of marriage can bring, folks.  I will confess that there was a fair amount of screaming at the television.  The offensive foul call on Zach Collins late in the second half was preposterous.  Yes, I am biased.  In fact, the Zags were called for 21 fouls versus just 14 for the Gamecocks, a disparity that my friend, Brian McBride, noted on Facebook could be attributed to playing styles.  South Carolina drives to the basket whereas Gonzaga tends to spread the floor and throw the ball inside to the big men.  Still, for this Gonzaga homer, it sure felt like South Carolina’s “amazing comeback” was due at least in part to them being put in the double bonus at the 10 minute mark while only being whistled for four fouls themselves.  And speaking of fouls and double bonuses…
  • Is It Time For College Hoops To Go To Four Quarters? – The NIT conducted an experiment this year where they set the foul limit to an NBA-esque five fouls and you shoot two free throws on every subsequent team foul, eliminating the one-and-one altogether.  They also reset the foul count at the 10 minute mark, effectively dividing the game into four, ten-minute quarters for foul purposes, though they still kept the traditional 20-minute halves for the overall game structure.  One of the goals was to cut down on the early parade to the free throw line when a team collects several fouls early in the half, such as in the aforementioned Gonzaga game.  Reports coming back say the referees really liked it.  I’m not sure what I think.  The one-and-one single bonus is a feature long lost from the pro game, and I don’t know if removing it from the college game is a good thing or not.  It would certainly be consistent with the latest push to simplify the game as evidenced by the removal of the five second closely guarded above the hash call (last season, I believe).  The women’s college game has already gone to four quarters.  What do you think?  Is this something you would like to see in the men’s game?  And speaking of the women’s game…
  • What’s The Statute Of Limitations On A Flagrant Foul? – Did you happen to catch the end of the women’s national semifinal between Mississippi State and the undefeated Connecticut Huskies?  The UConn women boasted the longest winning streak in collegiate basketball history at 111 games.  Weirdly, their handful of losses over the last decade or so have all come in overtime.  Anyway, this game was, indeed, in overtime, with Mississippi State up two and around a minute to play.  That’s when a Connecticut player took an elbow to the chin on a rebound that wasn’t called a foul.  The Bulldogs played an entire possession – about 20 seconds or so – which ended in some kind of dead ball situation without them scoring.  In a bizarre turn of events that followed, the team of officials went to the monitor and reviewed the elbow-to-the-chops play that happened earlier to see if there was a flagrant foul.  Now, riddle me this, Batman.  Why didn’t they stop the game immediately after that play for the review?  If they didn’t see it, so to speak, who or what prompted them to perform the review a full possession later in the game?  Did UConn coach Geno Auriemma request a review?  Was it some other official on the sideline?  I have no idea, but the whole thing seemed really sketchy to me.  After a ridiculously long delay, they ended up calling the flagrant foul after the fact, which gave UConn two shots and possession!  UConn made the free throws to tie the game, and the Mississippi State coach was understandably livid.  In what might be viewed as poetic justice, Mississippi State ended up winning the game anyway on an incredible buzzer beater after UConn made a boneheaded turnover instead of playing for the last shot.  Anyway, add this rant to my long list of reasons why the review process in college basketball has to change, especially in the area of flagrant fouls.  It would be one thing if a foul had been called, and then a review was made to determine if the foul actually called was flagrant, but in this case, no foul was called.  Somebody please explain to me how you justify a review in which a not-called foul became a flagrant foul AFTER THE ENSUING POSSESSION BY THE OTHER TEAM.  It sure feels like we’re making up rules as we go, and that’s bad for the game.
  • What’s Up, G? – In the spirit of my earlier rant on the frequent mispronunciation of Xavier, I would like to point out to Bill Raftery and Clark Kellogg that the word length has a “g” in it.  The g is not silent, so I am not sure why they pronounce it “lenth” rather than “length”.  Perhaps they don’t like the length of length and therefore shorten it to lenth?  Regardless of the reason, it makes me cringe every time they say it, and because today’s college game is stocked with tall players with long arms, they say it A LOT.

Quick Awards

And now for a few appetizer awards before the main course, the final awards that will come on Monday night.

  • The Benedict Arnold award goes to 5th place minion Rob “Tar Heel Die Hard” Foley who, after correctly picking both Gonzaga and UNC for the final game, picked Gonzaga to win.  I guess that Tar Heel fandom doesn’t die too hard after all.
  • The I Made It Out Of the 800s award goes to Paul Sopke who rose from 835th to 756th thanks to his one good pick of UNC.
  • The You Did The Math award goes to 8th place contestant Brian “How can I get 4 bonus points” Gerlach for realizing that even if his championship pick of Gonzaga pans out, he will still lose by 3 points.
  • The Breaking The Ties That Bind award goes to Alicia Davis, currently in 4th place, who leads the aforementioned 5th place contestant, Rob Foley, by virtue of the second tiebreaker ONLY.  They have the same total score and the same win-loss percentage, but Alicia scored one more bonus point than Rob.  One.  It doesn’t get any closer than that.
  • And finally, the Sharpest Knife In The Drawer award goes to contest leader Shawna Sharpe, who also leads by virtue of a tiebreak, in this case, the first tiebreaker, which is win-loss percentage.  Shawna can win the contest if UNC wins the championship on Monday night.  If Gonzaga wins Monday, then Alicia Davis will be our champion, yes, by the thinnest of margins, with Rob Foley coming in second because of the second tiebreaker.  That would absolutely be the closest photo finish in the history of our contest.

Only one game to go before we have a national champion and contest champion.  The only thing I have left to say this evening is, Go Zags!

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Homepage

Regional Finals, Part Two

“First of all, a lot of respect to you.  That’s a heck of a question.  I’ve been doing this a long time and that’s the first time anyone’s ever asked me that.” – South Carolina Head Coach Frank Martin responding to a question from SI Kids child-reporter “Max”

Ladies And Gentlemen, Cinderella Has Arrived At The Ball

I remember coach Frank Martin when he took an upstart Kansas State team to the brink of a Final Four in 2010.  In that year his Wildcat squad was a #2 seed and seemed to be on the fast track to the Final Four after a scrappy Butler team shocked #1 Syracuse in the Sweet Sixteen.  But after outlasting Xavier in double overtime to advance to the Elite Eight, the stern, no-nonsense, flat-topped Martin made a decision he later regretted and swore he would never make again.  He decided his guys had fought hard and deserved some rest, and so he did a walk through and shoot around on the off day between games rather than his usual grueling full practice.  Martin would later recount that his team slept-walked through the first half of the regional final, and ultimately lost to Gordon Haywood and the Butler Bulldogs, who came one 40-foot heave away from winning the championship at Lucas Oil Stadium that year, incidentally, the only Final Four I have personally attended.

Fast forward to 2017.  Martin is now at the helm of the South Carolina Gamecocks, the best team nobody was talking about coming in to the tournament.  After beating Baylor in convincing fashion in the Sweet Sixteen, Frank (as he insists his players call him – not coach or coach Martin, just Frank) would not repeat his past mistake.  Driving his players as hard as ever in the off day practice, he prepared them well for another victory in their showdown with SEC rival Florida, giving the school it’s first ever trip to the Final Four.  While this story may not quite have the same small school panache as Butler’s miraculous run to the championship game in 2010, it is no less of a Cinderella story given that for whatever sporting exploits South Carolina may be known, Men’s College Basketball is usually not in the conversation.  South Carolina certainly wasn’t on the radar of most of our contest entries.  Only three contestants, in fact, be they lucky or be they prescient, picked South Carolina for the Final Four without using a repick.  Those three contestants are currently ranked 1st, 2nd, and 5th in the standings.

As for the other game that happened today, you know, the boring one between the two college basketball Titans who have 37 Final Four appearances between them?  Yeah, it was a pretty good game.  Five points were scored in the final 8 seconds of regulation, first tying the game, and then sealing the two point victory for North Carolina with 0.3 seconds left on the clock.  North Carolina’s second consecutive Final Four and 20th overall (an NCAA record) is the antithesis of the rest of this year’s Final Four, the other three teams effectively making their first appearance.  (I say “effectively” because Oregon technically appeared in the “Final Four” in 1939, but that hardly counts.  It was the first year ever for a men’s basketball tournament, and it included only eight teams.  There was no final four, per se, even though Oregon went on to win the first ever national championship.  When I talk about Final Four, I implicitly limit the conversation to the modern 64-team era, which began in 1985.)

Quick Hitters

  • Lucky 7s – Weirdly, since 1985, no 7 seed had ever made the Final Four until UConn did it for the first time in 2014, ultimately winning the national championship that year.  Now, a 7 seed has made the Final Four three of the last four years: UConn in 2014, Michigan State in 2015, and now South Carolina in 2017.
  • How Big Is That Bandwagon? – 27 people jumped on the South Carolina bandwagon after they made the Sweet Sixteen, using a repick to put them in the Final Four.  Good choice.
  • The Minions’ Picks – Of those who still have their national champion left in the tournament, it is a nearly even split between Gonzaga with 119 votes and North Carolina with 111.  On the other hand, only six picked Oregon and just four are counting on South Carolina to complete the miracle.
  • Region By Region – A quick look at the Region Difficulty report shows that the South region was the easiest to pick, whereas the East (where most of the crazy upsets happened) was the hardest.  Overall the entire contest field got less than half the games correct in the East.
  • Four for Four? – Even with the benefit of repicks, not a single minion picked all four Final Four teams correctly this year.  By way of comparison, out of the 18+ million brackets submitted in ESPN’s bracket challenge, about 0.0035% correctly picked the Final Four.  If we apply that same ratio to our field, we would expect about three of us to get it right.  Apparently we are a bit behind the curve this year.
  • Sam, Spike, & Chuck – So what’s your favorite Capital One ad featuring the Samuel L. Jackson, Spike Lee, and Charles Barkley trio this year?  For me it’s a toss up between “Steaks On A Plane” and “You Put Your TV On The Clapper??!!!”  Now if only we could clap twice and turn Charles off during the halftime show.
  • You Mean Those Aren’t Real? – OK, confession time, minions.  Who thought Grant Hill’s Pizza Hut “Pie Tops” – basketball sneakers you can use to order a pizza from Pizza Hut – were a real thing?  Better yet, who WISHES they were a real thing?
  • Funniest Thing I Saw On Twitter Today – Recently at the Arnold Palmer Invitational at Bay Hill, PGA professional Cody Gribble was caught on camera casually slapping the tail of a large alligator to chase him off the course and back into the water.  I’m not sure if that’s brave, bold, or stupid.  In any case, after today’s upset of the Florida Gators, Bleacher Report posted an edited version of that video with the South Carolina Gamecock mascot superimposed over Gribble’s torso.  It was classic.  You’ll get it in a minute.

Awards

Now that all of the regional finals have been played, it’s time for the annual region-by-region awards, along with a few others.

  • The Beast Of The East award goes to Marco Randazzo for correctly picking 13 of the 15 games in the East region with original picks.  That’s quite a feat considering how difficult the East was to pick.
  • The Wild Wild West award goes to perfect prognosticator Carol Moritz who picked every game correctly in the West region with original picks.  Carol will receive a collectors edition copy of Will Smith’s colossal box office flop, Wild, Wild West on DVD.
  • The Crossroads Of America award goes to a dozen contestants who got every game but one correct in the Midwest region with original picks: Steve Porter, Jason Roehl, Aaron Marks, Manny Morales, Beth Gilles, Kathy Thomas, Martin Marks, Alyssa Regan, Lauren Hooley, Luke Walters, Rob Fair, and Dustin Pell.
  • The Southern Hospitality award goes the handful of minions who picked all 15 games correctly in the South region with original picks: Daniel Wirgau, Steve Elkins, Andrea Little, Denise Rodgers, and Kuba Njie.
  • The Stick A Fork In Me, I’m Done award goes to the army of contestants who have no winnable games remaining.  Better luck next year.
  • The Biggest Loser award goes to Andrew Ables for dropping from a high of 21st down to 627th.  Andrew will receive a year’s membership to LA Fitness.
  • The Enjoy It While It Lasts award goes to Nicholas “Talk about luck” Kusiak who has vaulted from a low of 777th all the way up to 2nd place.  Sadly, Nicholas has no more winnable games remaining, and thus, this will be the highest he ever gets.
  • Now that we have reached the Final Four, there are no more upset bonus points available.  The Upset Stomach award, sponsored by Pepto Bismol, goes to Bradley Walters for correctly picking 11 upsets and collecting 57 upset bonus points in the process.
  • The I Love This Awesome Scoring System award goes to Nathan “Link-N” Tucker who between upset bonuses and scategories bonuses has collected more bonus points than any other contestant, 77 bonus points to be exact.  With more losses than wins (29-31), Nathan is riding the SCARy train all the way into the station, or at least that’s what he is hoping for.
  • The What Moron Invented This Stupid Scoring System?! award goes to Millie “KajunKi” Charlson who picked 46 games correctly, which is just two less than the highest number of correct picks in the contest (48).  However, Millie hasn’t scored a single bonus point and sits in 266th place.
  • As I stated earlier, no one correctly picked the Final Four.  The Close But No Cigar award goes to a few contestants who got three out of four correct: Joel Klein, Andrew Bolin, Jamie Prime, Patty Carson, Paulette Baines, Kathy Thomas, Bethany Davis, Evan Whiteaker, and Laura Connell.  These folks got three out of four with original picks.
  • And finally, the Marco Polo award goes to Marco Randazzo, our current contest leader.  Marco has a sizable lead, but can only win one more game.  Chances are there aren’t any scenarios in which Marco can actually win, but I haven’t done the math yet, so that’s not necessarily a foregone conclusion.

This is shaping up to be an interesting finish to our contest.  Those who can still win all three remaining games are certainly in the strongest position, but a very small number of contestants stand to benefit with big time scategories bonus points if either South Carolina or Oregon keep winning, and those folks MAY not need to win more than one game to win the contest.  As I said, I haven’t done the math, but if you are so inclined, you have a week to crunch the numbers yourself.

It’s time for the Wizard to step behind the curtain and get back to real life for a while.  I hope you are enjoying the contest so far, and I look forward to wrapping things up next weekend with the Final Four.

GO ZAGS!

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Home Page

Regional Finals, Part One

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” – Mahatma Gandhi

Victory At Last

It was a night of firsts for the NCAA Tournament.  After 17 consecutive tournament appearances and three Elite Eights, the Gonzaga Bulldogs finally broke through to the Final Four.  Victory was especially sweet for the Zags faithful when you take into account that Gonzaga was generally considered the weakest of the four #1 seeds playing in the weakest of the four regions.  The “they had the easy path” excuse doesn’t go very far with this Zags fan, though.  How many of the so-called elite programs in this tournament wanted to see that West Virginia defense in the third round?  Let me answer that for you.  ZERO.

The task before every team wanting to make the Final Four is to win four consecutive games against whatever opponents the outcomes give you, and that’s exactly what Gonzaga did.  That cannot be taken away or diminished by speculation or endless “what-if” scenarios that are completely irrelevant.  What if they had to play in the region with UNC or Duke or Kentucky or Oregon?  What if they had to play Arizona instead of Xavier?  What if a monkey gnawed off Mark Few’s ear in the middle of the night?  That’s now how this tournament works.  You aren’t asked to beat 63 teams.  You only have to beat four to make the Final Four, six to win a championship, and right now I think Gonzaga has an excellent chance of winning two more games.

While this wasn’t the first ever appearance in the Final Four for the Oregon Ducks, it was the first time in a long time – 78 years to be exact.  While it may not be so surprising that Oregon won, the way in which they beat Kansas was a bit surprising given that Kansas had steamrolled its first three opponents so far, scoring in the 90s in every game.  It may be an unfair assessment, but it seems to me that Kansas continually underachieves in these tournaments.  That was a big factor in my own decision to take Oregon in this game when I made my repicks (I had Louisville originally coming out of the Midwest).  You just can’t count on Kansas in March.

And Now For The Utterly Random

  • Is Kansas Under Some Sort Of Curse? – Obviously Oregon played great defense, but what Kansas team was this that we saw play tonight?  The team that averaged something like 92 points per game in the first three games scored only 60 tonight, missing an incredible 20 three-point shot attempts.  At times the Jayhawks just couldn’t seem to buy a basket or a break.  Case in point, after pulling to within six points and getting a defensive stop, Kansas’ Josh Jackson literally tipped the rebound out of the waiting fingertips of teammate Frank Mason III right into the waiting arms of Oregon’s Jordan Bell.  It was that kind of night for Kansas.
  • 461 – That’s how many minions had Kansas in the Final Four.  Ouch.  Coincidentally, Kansas was also the most popular pick in the contest for national champion with 135 votes.  The second most popular pick?  Wait for it…Gonzaga with 119.
  • Almost Famous – There is perhaps no more ignominious job in all of basketball than to wield one of those mops to dry the players’ sweat off the floor.  Talk about an icky assignment.  One poor mop girl almost became famous tonight for all the wrong reasons when Gonzaga made an unexpected steal – Josh Perkins, I think it was – and stormed to the other end for an easy layup.  But first, Perkins, who looked as bewildered as the mop girl, had to wait for her to scurry off the court.  Fortunately this turned out to be a case of no harm, no foul.
  • And Now, A Word Or Two From Reggie – I want to thank Uncle Reggie for using one of Jordan Bell’s eight blocked shots to help us Pacer fans relive one of the worst moments in Pacer playoff history when Tayshaun Prince impossibly blocked Reggie’s breakaway layup.  And speaking of Jordan Bell, when it was reported that he was frustrated with his team and coaches for not communicating to him that the shot clock was running down, Reggie produced the perfect Captain Obvious moment when he quipped, “All he has to do is look at those big red numbers up there above the basket.”  Gotta love Reggie.  I think he does a great job in broadcasting.
  • The Best Thing I Saw On TV Today – When I first tuned in to the TBS pre-game show, I was greeted not by Greg, Clark, Kenny, and Charles, but by puppets made in their likenesses.  It was excellent, creative, and extremely cute.
  • ICYMI – Direct TV and AT&T have co-opted the old Aerosmith power ballad, “I Don’t Want To Miss a Thing” for an absurd ad campaign for their live streaming service. Greg Gumble looks completely uncomfortable next to the lounge singer dude in the awful leisure suit.  This is one commercial I wouldn’t mind missing for the rest of the tournament.
  • What, No Bill? – Not sure if Bill Murray was MIA at tonight’s game, or if he just didn’t get any camera time because Xavier got trounced.  Maybe he was live streaming the game on his AT&T device.
  • The Worst Thing I Saw On TV Today – Did anyone catch Gonzaga big man Przemek Karnowski slobbering a loogie in that gnarly beard of his as he was putting on his commemorative Final Four t-shirt after the game?  As TV sports gross-out moments go, that’s right up there with Pete Sampras vomiting through his nose at the US Open in 1996.

Awards

I only have time for a couple of awards tonight.  There will be more when the Final Four is complete tomorrow night.

  • The I’m Only In This For The Awards award goes to all of you who just skipped everything in this commentary before the Awards heading just to see if you got a shout out by name.  You know who you are.  Hey, I work really hard trying to come up with all of this clever shtick.  But that’s OK.  Even though you didn’t read it, my feelings aren’t hurt.  That much.
  • The It’s Gotta Be The Beard award goes to 21st place minion Jeff Beard whose surname must be as lucky as Karnowski’s months-unshaven mane.
  • The No Award For You award, given in honor of the Soup Nazi from Seinfeld, goes to Brad Walters for ridiculously still being in first place despite losing his last remaining team in the tournament, Xavier.  There’s nowhere to go but down the leader board from here.
  • The Big Mac Attack award goes to George McAtee for ascending to 16th place.  George will receive a year’s supply of Big Macs along with a complementary copy of Supersize Me on DVD.

Tune in tomorrow when we will hand out the awards for the top prognosticators in each region along with other fun stuff.

Until then…

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Home Page

Eight Is Enough

“The secret of the fox

Ancient mystery

Somewhere deep in the woods

I know you’re hiding

What is your sound?” – The Fox by Ylvis

Three Beatings And A Buzzer Beater

Tonight’s games whittled the field down to eight with three convincing victories and this year’s tournament’s first overtime game and first buzzer beater.  Tonight was also marked by some stellar individual performances.

  • What Does This Fox Say? “Lonzo who?” – I’m not sure what it would be like for your dad to provide all of the billboard material for your opponent’s locker room, but I suppose for UCLA’s Lonzo Ball, it doesn’t matter now.  He’s on his way to his NBA millions.  Still, whether the rumors are true that Kentucky’s De’Aaron Fox took all the Lonzo Ball hype personally is anyone’s guess, but what is undisputed is the historic nature of Fox’s performance.  Fox’s 39 points were the most ever by a freshman in NCAA Tournament history, and the most ever by a player of any class since Tayshaun Prince scored 41 in 2002.  Kentucky has now won 14 in a row, and UCLA’s defeat leaves the conference of champions with just one remaining representative, the Oregon Ducks, who will play Kansas for the Midwest regional championship tomorrow.
  • Apparently, It’s Bear Season – It wasn’t a good night to be a Bear, as the Baylor Bears went the way of their Bruin brethren, going down in tonight’s most lopsided defeat.  The normally high-powered Baylor offense managed only 50 points against South Carolina’s defense (which, by the way, I respect way more than West Virginia’s), and now the Gamecocks will play Florida in an extremely rare SEC showdown for a trip to the Final Four.
  • Here’s A Clue: The Butler Didn’t Do It – The game between North Carolina and Butler wasn’t nearly as close as the final score implies.  While I would have loved to have seen another David-beats-Goliath performance turned in by Indy’s scrappy hometown heroes, the Bulldogs were simply overrun by superior talent and size.  North Carolina will now face Kentucky in this year’s sole #1 vs #2 match up in a regional final.
  • Lightning Strikes Twice – I think it’s safe to label the running, leaning, three-point floater as a desperation shot with a high degree difficulty and a low probability of success.  Seeing two such shots in the same game, both having significant impact on the outcome, is truly amazing, and if you managed to stay awake for the finish of the most exciting game of the night, that’s what you were treated to.  First, Wisconsin’s Zak Showalter hits the aforementioned Steph-Curry-eat-your-heart-out shot with 2.1 seconds left in regulation to force overtime, this after trailing by 12 points with 4:15 to play.  While Florida’s KeVaughn Allen had the night’s big number with 35 points, it was Chris Chiozza who earned his place in One Shining Moment.  After two Nigel Hayes free throws seemed to secure victory for the Badgers, a seemingly discombobulated Wisconsin defense watched helplessly as Chiozza dribbled the length of the court in four seconds and hoisted up the second running three-pointer, which he shot nearly uncontested and drained at the buzzer for a stunning one-point victory.
  • Conference Comparisons – I’ll admit I have never thought much of the SEC as a basketball conference.  Nevertheless, after receiving only four bids to the tournament, three SEC teams are in the final eight, and at least one will be in the Final Four.  Meanwhile, of the nine ACC teams that were invited to the dance, only North Carolina remains.  The other half of the remaining eight is made up, one each, of representatives from the Big East, Big 12, Conference Of Champions, and Truck Stop League.  I think everybody knows who I’m rooting for.
  • Best Thing I Saw On TV Today – After the game, pretty much every player and coaching staff member from both Baylor and South Carolina gathered at center court, arms around one another’s shoulders, and bowed their heads for what certainly appeared to be a moment of prayer.  Whether it was planned or spontaneous I do not know, but what a tremendous display of class and sportsmanship.  Three cheers for these two teams demonstrating how to be good winners and losers.
  • Scategoria – Those of you who have been on the South Carolina bandwagon from the beginning are enjoying some serious bonus points.  The last two wins by the Gamecocks have earned you Scategories bonuses in addition to the upset bonus.  There are still some Scategories bonuses to be had this weekend, and those can have significant impact on the standings, so stay tuned and check out the Possible Scategories Bonuses report.

And speaking of winners and losers, it’s time for a few awards.

Final Sweet Sixteen Awards

  • The Six Pack award goes to three contestants who picked six of the final eight teams correctly with original picks: Gary Tucker, Bethany Davis, and Beth Gilles.  Have a Coke and a smile and enjoy your success.
  • The Crazy Eights award goes to 17th place minion Sammy Randazzo who, with the help of the repicks, managed to pick all eight of the Elite Eight correctly.  Second time’s a charm, Sammy.  Way to go!
  • The Here Comes The Boom award goes to Josh Pearman for once being in 12th and now having dropped to 535th.  Cue the POD tune.
  • The Movin’ On Up award goes to Nicholas Kusiak for climbing from 777th to 63rd. Nicholas will receive a collector’s edition of the first season of The Jeffersons on DVD signed by Sherman Hemsley.
  • The Fake News Award For Most Unbelievable Alias goes to Trevor “No Logic, No Strategy, All Coinflips” Norcross whose picks look a bit more loaded with basketball knowledge than one would expect from the coin flip approach.  Trevor is currently in 5th.
  • The Sharp Shooter award goes to Shawna “SHARPESHOOTER – or not” Sharpe for having a sharp name, sharply punny alias, and sharp picking skills.  Shawna is 46-10 and sits in 32nd place.  Only one other contestant has won 46 games, but he has received at least one award already.
  • The Marco Polo award goes to the Michigan State loving, repick eschewing, South Carolina bandwagon riding, 3rd place minion Marco Randazzo.  I’m not sure if anyone has ever won the contest without picking the national champion, but depending on how many more games South Carolina can win, Marco might have a chance of doing it.
  • And finally, the I Can’t Believe I’m I Still In First With These Awful Picks award goes to Brad “Boilerbrad” Walters, who is still clinging to first place despite having just one team remaining in the tournament (Xavier).  Even if Xavier wins two more games and Brad maximizes his potential points, I still have my doubts that he can win.  So, enjoy it while it lasts, brother.

That’s all for now, minions.  The regional finals are this weekend, which will give us the Final Four and hopefully some exciting games and rearranging in our standings.  Until next time…

The Wizard of Whiteland

Contest Homepage